Suri Conspiracy #10056-563.666
Witizens:
I am so happy that Rogue and WW4Shoes totally embrace their genius/witsiness... truly, they get it. I was having a crappy day, and as God would will it, I read the brilliantly written "Suri Conspiracy #10056-563.566", and was in hysterics for quite some time. KUDOS! Not only is this conspiracy theory more realistic than the baby being of Satan's lineage (you can't prove/disprove that one either, so don't try), there is more documentation than one could imagine to support Rogue Scholar's conspiracy theory.
Since I know lazy people probably won't read further into TMZ.com (which I totally love now) brilliant reports, I figured I'd lay them out here.
Both babies were born on April 18 at St. John's Hospital in Santa Monica, where one Anne Heffernan is the registered nurse who signed both birth certificates. Heffernan, who never saw Suri, signed her birth certificate (she's only authorized to sign when a doctor is not available).
On the Suri Cruise certificate, Heffernan's license number is G48079. On the Grier Henchy certificate, Heffernan's license number is different -- G068399. After TMZ checked with the California Board of Registered Nursing, they were told Heffernan's license number didn't match either of the birth certificates; her real license number is 317058.
The license number on Grier's certificate comes back to a Dorothy Rork; whereas the license number on Suri's birth certificate is a mystery. There is no name attached to that license number.
As Rogue Scholar wrote, someone listed as "Friend" signed the certificate for Suri, unlike Brooke Shields who signed the one for her daughter (and like every other parent in the free standing world!!!).
All I have to say about the mysteries of childbirth is that it's never been surrounded by so much mystery due to the parents' wacky tactics. I'm close to thinking that when photos are finally published (word on the streets is the photos have already been sold to a big name magazine), that I won't be able to see Suri. I imagine that the photos of the family will be Tom will be holding his hands up in the air, Katie feeding and cradling nothing but air. It should be interesting to see how the world receives this little devil, alien, mirage baby... It's fun enough for me not seeing her.
Truly,
Not~So~Cosmo
I am so happy that Rogue and WW4Shoes totally embrace their genius/witsiness... truly, they get it. I was having a crappy day, and as God would will it, I read the brilliantly written "Suri Conspiracy #10056-563.566", and was in hysterics for quite some time. KUDOS! Not only is this conspiracy theory more realistic than the baby being of Satan's lineage (you can't prove/disprove that one either, so don't try), there is more documentation than one could imagine to support Rogue Scholar's conspiracy theory.
Since I know lazy people probably won't read further into TMZ.com (which I totally love now) brilliant reports, I figured I'd lay them out here.
Both babies were born on April 18 at St. John's Hospital in Santa Monica, where one Anne Heffernan is the registered nurse who signed both birth certificates. Heffernan, who never saw Suri, signed her birth certificate (she's only authorized to sign when a doctor is not available).
On the Suri Cruise certificate, Heffernan's license number is G48079. On the Grier Henchy certificate, Heffernan's license number is different -- G068399. After TMZ checked with the California Board of Registered Nursing, they were told Heffernan's license number didn't match either of the birth certificates; her real license number is 317058.
The license number on Grier's certificate comes back to a Dorothy Rork; whereas the license number on Suri's birth certificate is a mystery. There is no name attached to that license number.
As Rogue Scholar wrote, someone listed as "Friend" signed the certificate for Suri, unlike Brooke Shields who signed the one for her daughter (and like every other parent in the free standing world!!!).
All I have to say about the mysteries of childbirth is that it's never been surrounded by so much mystery due to the parents' wacky tactics. I'm close to thinking that when photos are finally published (word on the streets is the photos have already been sold to a big name magazine), that I won't be able to see Suri. I imagine that the photos of the family will be Tom will be holding his hands up in the air, Katie feeding and cradling nothing but air. It should be interesting to see how the world receives this little devil, alien, mirage baby... It's fun enough for me not seeing her.
Truly,
Not~So~Cosmo
posted by Not So Cosmo @ 7:54 AM
2 Comments:
At 3:52 PM,
Will Work For Shoes said…
I saw this on another blog.
Tom Cruise has invited Victoria and David Beckham to meet baby Suri. However, there is a list of of instructions of how to behave around their daughter. A source told Britain's Daily Star newspaper: "Apparently they can't take any photographic equipment, they're banned from touching Suri and they're not allowed to do any baby-talk around her."
At 8:01 PM,
Not So Cosmo said…
Because baby talk, bright lights(flash photography), and the love of touch will make Lucifer's seed perish? Seriously, I hope I never see Suri Cruise.
Post a Comment
<< Home